Machine Learning Times
Machine Learning Times
EXCLUSIVE HIGHLIGHTS
Why You Must Twist Your Data Scientist’s Arm To Estimate AI’s Value
 Originally published in Forbes, June 11, 2024. If you’ve...
3 Ways Predictive AI Delivers More Value Than Generative AI
 Originally published in Forbes, March 4, 2024. Which kind...
AI Success Depends On How You Choose This One Number
 Originally published in Forbes, March 25, 2024. To do...
Elon Musk Predicts Artificial General Intelligence In 2 Years. Here’s Why That’s Hype
 Originally published in Forbes, April 10, 2024 When OpenAI’s...
SHARE THIS:

2 years ago
Podcast: The Accuracy Fallacy and the Media’s Bogus Coverage of AI

  Welcome to the next episode of The Machine Learning Times Executive Editor Eric Siegel’s podcast, The Doctor Data Show. Click here for all episodes and links to listen on your preferred platform. The Accuracy Fallacy and the Media’s Bogus Coverage of AI Podcast episode description:  Misleading headlines abound, claiming that machine learning can “accurately” predict criminality, psychosis, sexual orientation, and bestselling books. But, when practitioners claim their model achieves “high accuracy,” it’s often bogus. Can AI “tell” if you’re going to have a heart attack? Contrary to bold, public claims, no it cannot. This episode unpacks the undeniable yet

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in on the right (desktop) or below (mobile). If not, register today and gain free access to original content and industry news. See the details here.

Comments are closed.