For more on the analytics of the Internet of Things, attend Predictive Analytics World for Manufacturing, June 8-11, 2015 in Chicago.
Let’s kick this post off with a quick quiz. Read each statement below and determine if it’s referring to big data or the Internet of Things:
Here’s the answers: 1 – big data; 2 – Internet of Things; 3 – Internet of Things; and 4 – big data. So how did you do? To be honest, if I didn’t have the answers in front of me, I’m not so sure I’d get all these right. I recently conducted this same quiz during a presentation at a CIO event to “warm up” the attendees. With the exception of question 3 (which they nailed), they were pretty much split on their answers.
Which brings me to the point of this post: What is the relationship between big data and the Internet of Things (IoT)? Are they related and/or are they two sides of the same coin? Let’s examine further.
About the Mauritius conference. In October 2014, representatives from the private sector and academia came together in Mauritius for the 36th International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners. The purpose was to discuss both the positive and negative impact of big data and IoT in our daily lives, and the objective was to establish principles and recommendations on how to reduce the risks associated with collecting and using data in this big data-IoT era.
The observations and conclusions of the conference were captured in two documents: the Mauritius Resolution on Big Data and the Mauritius Declaration on the Internet of Things. Both documents acknowledge that IoT’s connected devices coupled with big data can make our lives easier, but there are still important concerns about individuals’ privacy and civil rights.
Here’s a summary of both documents (as reported on Inside Privacy):
Mauritius Resolution on Big Data
Mauritius Declaration on the Internet of Things
Why it matters. As you can see, these documents do not express any new sentiments around data protection and privacy, but the fact that these issues could be articulated and adopted by these international data protection regulators show how important these issues have become in this big data-IoT era. Unfortunately, these documents are not binding, but they do provide relevant indicators on the direction data privacy policies and trends are going.
Interestingly enough, the issues raised at the Mauritius conference were also reflected in the White House’s reports on big data privacy earlier this year (that I wrote about). Namely, they both raised serious concerns around discrimination against certain groups, personalization, and the de-identification and re-identification of individuals.
My proposal. There is clearly a relationship between big data and IoT. The Mauritius conference helps confirm that. In fact, I would propose that big data is a subset of the IoT discussion. Here’s my rationale:
Too simple? Perhaps. But given how complex both big data and IoT can be, we need to start somewhere. I plan to expand more on this concept in the upcoming months.
One final thought. For this blog series in 2015, I will be talking more about IoT as it relates to data monetization, ownership, privacy, and security. This year’s big data discussion has just paved the way to this larger IoT discussion. And just when you thought things were beginning to slow down…
Enjoy your holidays—but get some rest. 2015 is going to be a wild ride!
By: Tamara Dull, Director of Emerging Technologies, SAS Best Practices
Originally published at www.smartdatacollective.com